The year was 1910 and the charter of the city (where I currently reside) empowered city officials to enforce disparate, and what now seems quaint-sounding regulations. Here are a couple of examples:
“To prescribe the width of tires of all vehicles.”
“To regulate and prevent public criers, advertising notices, steam whistles, the ringing of bells and the playing of bands.”
It seems harmless enough, but jump ahead 100 years to 2010 and cash strapped states are now targeting motorcyclists. Huh?
That’s correct. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is offering federal funds to expand the practice of creating motorcycle-only checkpoints by law enforcement agencies. Specifically it’s called the “Motorcycle Law Enforcement Demonstration Grant” (DTNH22-10-R-00386).
Initially started in New York State, the process involves setting-up checkpoints where only motorcycles are pulled over. Law enforcement officers then check for U.S. DOT-compliant helmets, legal exhaust systems, and compliance with licensing, registration and inspection regulations. The NHTSA program would also collect information on high-motorcycle-crash-incident areas and citations would be issued for any violations discovered. Law enforcement officials in New York have defended the program as a safety measure to decrease motorcycle crashes, injuries and fatalities – the extra public $$ is just a bonus – yet there is no proof of its effectiveness.
But wait… there’s more. The NHTSA is now seeking up to five other law enforcement agencies to participate in this practice and is offering from $70,000 to $350,000 in federal funding. I wonder how long until one of the states in the northwest opts in?
Basically our freedom to ride is under attack because of Federally funded discriminatory motorcycle checkpoint stops that don’t require any probable cause other than riding a motorcycle!
What can you do?
As of July 2010, no NHTSA awards have been awarded, but you can contact your state senators and representatives and complain that the NHTSA is using our tax dollars to fund a program that targets bikers. Unlike Arizona where the law doesn’t specify a type of person, but “may” result in racial profiling, in this case the target is defined and profiling would be, in fact, it’s clearly a part of the program. It may be unconstitutional and at minimum is a waste of our tax dollars.
If you prefer the AMA has developed an online email/letter to Administrator Strickland urging him to suspend the grant program until profiling questions have been addressed.
Photo courtesy of NY Police.
Hummmm. Maybe, just maybe we riders and the aftermarket industry will just have to come to grips with the fact that performance exhausts do not have to be loud! Stop and look at what the car exhaust aftermarket industry has done. The new performance exhaust systems for cars are not loud, but they sound good and improve performance … hummm.
The whole loud pipes save lives is a weak justification for those riders who want to be obnoxiously loud and for many it is there tool to upset the non-riders.
well, they already pull over trucks to inspect. Shouldn’t we be concerned about that as well? I like to keep my bikes unoffensively stock. You do not have a “right” to modify the federally mandated equipment on your bike and it is a privilege to ride. Let’s not do anything to have that privilege revoked.
[…] written previously about how motorcycle safety outweighs individual liberty as state and local governments have begun […]
I hardly leave a response, however i did
a few searching and wound up here City Government Controls Motorcycle Tire Width Northwest Harley Blog.
And I do have a couple of questions for you if it’s allright. Could it be just me or does it look as if like some of the responses appear like left by brain dead visitors? 😛 And, if you are writing at other places, I’d
like to keep up with anything new you have to post.
Would you make a list of every one of all your
public pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?